ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Gender-specific effects of meat consumption on type 2 diabetes: a narrative review of prospective cohort studies.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of the review: This narrative review examines the association between meat consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with a focus on gender-specific effects. Results: Prospective cohort studies indicate that processed and red meat consumption is associated with an increased risk of T2DM, with stronger associations generally observed in men. In contrast, white meat shows weaker and inconsistent associations, with modest increases in risk reported more often in women. Summary: The evidence supports the relevance of gender in dietary recommendations for the prevention of T2DM. Biological and behavioral differences, such as hormonal profiles, iron metabolism, fat distribution and culinary habits, may underlie sex-specific susceptibilities. Personalized dietary strategies should take these differences into account to improve prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.