ReviewNature and science of sleep2025
From Needles to Photons: Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Mechanistic Insights of Laser Acupuncture in Insomnia Management.
Review in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insomnia constitutes a significant worldwide public health burden. Limitations of conventional treatments, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy and hypnotic medications, have fueled growing interest in complementary and alternative medicine approaches, including laser acupuncture (LA). This comprehensive mini-review evaluates LA's effects and mechanisms for insomnia management. Clinical evidence indicates that LA alleviates both primary insomnia and comorbid cases (eg, with cancer, hypertension, and perimenopausal syndrome). LA demonstrates efficacy comparable to traditional needle acupuncture in improving subjective and objective sleep quality, while also reducing affective symptoms and enhancing quality of life. This provides an appealing alternative for needle-phobia patients. LA appears generally safe, with only mild, transient adverse effects reported. Mechanistic investigations suggest that LA may act via neurotransmitter modulation, autonomic nervous system regulation, and alterations in brain wave activity. However, methodological limitations -- particularly small sample sizes, heterogeneous populations, incomplete treatment parameter reporting, and insufficient follow-ups -- compromise the current evidence base. Future research should adopt multicenter, large-scale, placebo-controlled randomized trials, complemented by advanced techniques such as neuroimaging, polysomnography, and neurochemical assays, to further validate the therapeutic potential of LA and elucidate its underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.