ReviewWorld journal of radiology2025
Large language models and large concept models in radiology: Present challenges, future directions, and critical perspectives.
Review in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI at the Sella Turcica: Multi-Model Large Language Model Evaluation in Pituitary Adenomas.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in radiology artificial intelligence (AI), offering significant capabilities in areas such as image report generation, clinical decision support, and workflow optimization. The first part of this manuscript presents a comprehensive overview of the current state of LLM applications in radiology, including their historical evolution, technical foundations, and practical uses. Despite notable advances, inherent architectural constraints, such as token-level sequential processing, limit their ability to perform deep abstract reasoning and holistic contextual understanding, which are critical for fine-grained diagnostic interpretation. We provide a critical perspective on current LLMs and discuss key challenges, including model reliability, bias, and explainability, highlighting the pressing need for novel approaches to advance radiology AI. Large concept models (LCMs) represent a nascent and promising paradigm in radiology AI, designed to transcend the limitations of token-level processing by utilizing higher-order conceptual representations and multimodal data integration. The second part of this manuscript introduces the foundational principles and theoretical framework of LCMs, highlighting their potential to facilitate enhanced semantic reasoning, long-range context synthesis, and improved clinical decision-making. Critically, the core of this section is the proposal of a novel theoretical framework for LCMs, formalized and extended from our group's foundational concept-based models - the world's earliest articulation of this paradigm for medical AI. This conceptual shift has since been externally validated and propelled by the recent publication of the LCM architectural proposal by Meta AI, providing a large-scale engineering blueprint for the future development of this technology. We also outline future research directions and the transformative implications of this emerging AI paradigm for radiologic practice, aiming to provide a blueprint for advancing toward human-like conceptual understanding in AI. While challenges persist, we are at the very beginning of a new era, and it is not unreasonable to hope that future advancements will overcome these hurdles, pushing the boundaries of AI in Radiology, far beyond even the most state-of-the-art models of today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.