ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Network analysis of cognition and function in Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Traditional approaches in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research examine cognitive symptoms in isolation, potentially overlooking dynamic interrelationships among impairment domains. This study employed network analysis to examine structural organization of cognitive and functional domains in mild (mAD) and moderate-to-severe (Mod-sAD) Alzheimer's disease, aiming to identify stage-specific symptom structures and inform targeted interventions. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 134 participants diagnosed with AD according to DSM-5 criteria. Participants were classified into mAD (n=37) and Mod-sAD (n=97) groups. Regularized partial correlation networks with extended Bayesian information criterion regularization examined symptom interdependencies across six CDR domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Network comparison tests and centrality analyses identified structural differences between disease stages. Results: The Mod-sAD group demonstrated significantly higher impairment scores across all domains ( Conclusions: AD progression features increasing network density and centrality shifts from executive-function-centered networks in mild AD to memory-centered networks in moderate-to-severe stages. Findings suggest stage-specific interventions: executive enhancement in mild AD and memory-focused approaches in advanced stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.