ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Using machine learning methods to predict post-traumatic stress disorder in stroke patients in China.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to utilize various machine learning algorithms to construct a risk prediction model for post-stroke Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), select the optimal model, and identify risk factors. Methods: A total of 249 stroke patients from two tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province and Shandong Province were selected and randomly divided into the training group and the validation group. Based on the results of Logistic regression analysis, a risk prediction model for PTSD after stroke was constructed by using Logistic regression, Random forest (RF) and K-nearest neighbor algorithm, and further verification was conducted according to the best algorithm. Results: The incidence of PTSD in stroke patients was 40.56%, and the RF model was the best. Feature importance ranking shows that the factors affecting PTSD in stroke patients are: Stroke type (0.187), Sleep in the last three months (0.152), Way of hospitalization (0.147), Monthly household income (0.133), Hypertension (0.108), Gender (1.104), Marital status (0.079), Physical exercise situation (0.067), and Educational background (0.023). Conclusion: The model based on the RF algorithm has the best predictive performance, and the factors affecting PTSD in stroke patients include stroke type, gender, Way of hospitalization, Sleep in the last three months, Physical exercise situation, Hypertension, etc. The results of this study can assist clinical medical staff to screen high-risk groups of PTSD after stroke and provide the basis for early implementation of targeted preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.