Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41356679›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

How digital mindfulness training promotes meaning in life among social workers: a parallel mediation analysis and latent profile analysis.

Chang Rui, Jun Cao, Fuqiang Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chang RuiInstitute of Tourism Research, Huainan Normal University, Huainan, Anhui, China.
Jun CaoInstitute of Tourism Research, Huainan Normal University, Huainan, Anhui, China.
Fuqiang TanInstitute of Tourism Research, Huainan Normal University, Huainan, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates the mechanisms by which digital mindfulness training promotes meaning in life among social workers and explores individual heterogeneity in this process. Methods: A parallel mediation model was used to test the pathways from digital mindfulness training to meaning in life. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was employed to identify distinct subgroups among the participants. Results: All five proposed hypotheses received strong empirical support. Our analysis revealed that social workers who participated in digital mindfulness programs reported a stronger meaning in life. The parallel mediation model identified two distinct pathways: digital mindfulness training was associated with (1) reduced perceived social exclusion and, separately, (2) fewer psychotic-like experiences. Both of these factors, in turn, independently contributed to a greater meaning in life. The LPA identified five distinct subgroups: the "Flourishing Professional," "Socially Isolated yet Resilient," "Typical Practitioner," "Internally Struggling but Connected," and "High-Risk and Distressed." These groups differed significantly in meaning in life, with the "High-Risk and Distressed" category scoring the lowest. Discussion: Viewed together, these patterns form a coherent explanatory structure that helps clarify how mindfulness interventions may operate. The findings also point to the importance of tailoring program content and delivery to address the particular vulnerabilities and strengths of each subgroup, rather than relying on a single, generic format.

Indexed as

digital mindfulness traininglatent profile analysismeaning in lifeperceived social exclusionsocial workers

Identifiers

PMID41356679
PMCPMC12679151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.