ArticleBJUI compass2025
Incidence of ideal candidates for focal therapy: A scoping study following the FALCON Consensus Statements.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Beyond Total PSA: Clinical Significance of S2,3PSA% in Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Review
- Incidence of ideal candidates for focal therapy: A scoping study following the FALCON Consensus Statements.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Ideal candidates for focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) have mpMRI-visible ISUP Grade Group 2-3, localized disease. Transperineal (TP) prostate biopsies provide superior positional information of PCa in the transverse axis, and possibly higher PCa detection rates-important in choosing FT modalities. Here, we describe the frequency of optimal FT candidates among a large cohort of men with proven PCa identified from MRI-guided targeted and systematic TP biopsy. Methods: We queried the Northwestern data warehouse for men with newly diagnosed PCa who had a positive mpMRI (PI-RADS 3-5) and a TP biopsy prior to diagnosis from January 2018 to June 2024. Patients with disease optimal for FT were determined using modified FALCON consensus guidelines with emphasis on mpMRI and biopsy findings. We also explored the disparity in FT candidacy when using only target cores compared to combined target and systematic cores. Results: We identified 1342 men diagnosed with PCa on combined targeted and systematic TP biopsy after a positive mpMRI, of which 888 men had intermediate-risk PCa. Of these 888 men, 439 patients (49.4%) had unilateral-dominant disease, while 329 patients (37%) had unilateral-dominant and anterior (106; 11.9%) or posterior-dominant (223; 25.1%) disease. Up to half of the patients considered good candidates on target cores were considered FT-ineligible on review of systematic cores. Conclusions: FT may be considered in up to 50% of patients with intermediate risk disease, while ideal candidates for functional preservation constitute a smaller number. Review of both targeted and systematic biopsy cores is crucial in determining FT candidacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.