ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
A Novel Atraumatic Polymer-Assisted Peripheral Nerve Repair Device Compared With Microsurgical Neurorrhaphy.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Sutureless Hydrogel Device for Peripheral Nerve Repair.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Sutureless Approach to Nerve Repair: Results From a Clinical Study in Digital Nerves.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Contemporary Strategies of Gene and Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Peripheral Nervous System Injuries and Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the ability of a polymer-assisted device to repair transected peripheral nerve in comparison to microsuture neurorrhaphy. Methods: Twenty rat sciatic nerves were transected and repaired using either the polymer-assisted system or microsutures. Peripheral nerve functional recovery was evaluated through nerve conduction analysis performed at 1, 2, and 3 months. The gastrocnemius muscle mass ratio was measured. Peripheral nerve samples were imaged using microcomputed tomography. Local tissue response and nerve repair (including axonal density) were assessed through histology. Results: No significant differences in functional outcomes were observed between the polymer-assisted system and microsutures. Both groups showed signs of nerve conduction as early as 2 month, which increased by the 3 month end point where muscle regrowth reached 60% of the nonoperated contralateral leg. Microcomputed tomography and histological analysis revealed a trend of increased intraneural fibrosis and a significantly lower axonal density when microsutures were used for the repair ( Conclusions: The polymer-assisted system may reduce intraneural fibrosis compared to traditional microsutures, whereas functional recovery was found to be equivalent. Clinical relevance: The polymer-assisted nerve repair device provides an alternative to microsutures without inducing additional trauma to the damaged peripheral nerve ends because of the nonpenetrative nature of the device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.