ReviewHealth science reports2025
Emotional Experiences of the Home-Dwelling Older Adults During the Isolation of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Qualitative Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: This systematic qualitative review aimed to provide an in-depth understanding of the emotional experiences and coping strategies of home-dwelling older adults, as expressed in their own words, during the quarantine period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and other related databases. Articles published between January 2020 and December 2021 were identified using predefined keywords. After screening studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant data were extracted, and the results were synthesized. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the COREQ checklist. A total of 43 qualitative studies were included in the final review. Results: Based on COREQ evaluation, most studies demonstrated good methodological quality, with a mean score of 25.81 out of 32 (range: 17-29); no study fully satisfied all COREQ criteria. Thematic synthesis revealed two main categories: (i) Emotional Challenges, which encompassed psychological, physical, technological, and social dimensions; (ii) Coping Strategies, which were classified into cognitive (mindset-based), behavioral (function-based), and technology-assisted strategies. These findings highlight the emotional complexity and adaptability of older adults during isolation. Conclusions: Contrary to initial assumptions of vulnerability, many older adults approached the pandemic with rational understanding and adaptive responses. By drawing on past life experiences, they actively organized coping mechanisms to navigate the crisis. These insights emphasize the need for health policymakers to invest in resilience-building initiatives, such as digital literacy training and community-based emotional and physical support programs. Such strategies can enhance the quality of life for older adults and promote efficient resource utilization within health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.