ArticleInternational journal of food science2025
Comparative Metabolomic and Pharmacognostic Analysis of
Article in International journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles UsingMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Metabolomic and Pharmacognostic Analysis ofInternational journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Methods: Extracts were subjected to physiochemical analysis (FTIR, GC-MS, and TLC/HPTLC), quantitative analysis (total phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin content), antioxidant activity (DPPH, ABTS, NO, and SO assays), toxicity (brine shrimp and hemolysis), and anticancer activity (MTT). Results: FTIR analysis revealed major functional groups in HME and fewer in HE. GC-MS analysis identified various compounds in HME, including estragole, beta-farnesene, alpha-bergamotene, alpha-copaene, eicosapentaenoic acid, and neophytadiene, while HE contained estragole, 1-heptatriacotanol, alpha-bergamotene, and tau-cadinol. TLC/HPTLC analysis reflects that both extracts contain complex mixtures of bioactive compounds. HME exhibited significantly higher levels of phenolics (122.72 ± 4.02 mg GAE/g), flavonoids (42.47 ± 0.59 mg QE/g), and tannins (30.91 ± 0.31 mg TAE/g) compared to HE (75.94 ± 0.93, 26.65 ± 1.17, and 1.99 ± 0.07 mg/g, respectively). In addition, HME exhibited significantly stronger antioxidant activity, as evidenced by lower IC Conclusion: Integrating metabolomics and pharmacognostic studies provided a comprehensive understanding of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.