Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41356576›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of food science2025

Comparative Metabolomic and Pharmacognostic Analysis of

Vaibhavi Srivastava, Ann Maria Joseph, Priyesh Kumar, Khairah Ansari, Krupali Trivedi, Nilam Parmar, Bhakti Patel, Ashish Patel, Dipak Kumar Sahoo, Devendrasinh Jhala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles UsingMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparative Metabolomic and Pharmacognostic Analysis ofInternational journal of food science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vaibhavi SrivastavaDepartment of Zoology, Biomedical Technology, Human Genetics and Wildlife Biology & Conservation, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, gujaratuniversity.org.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4923-4012
Ann Maria JosephDepartment of Zoology, Biomedical Technology, Human Genetics and Wildlife Biology & Conservation, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, gujaratuniversity.org.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5205-6140
Priyesh KumarDepartment of Zoology, Biomedical Technology, Human Genetics and Wildlife Biology & Conservation, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, gujaratuniversity.org.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6882
Khairah AnsariDepartment of Zoology, Biomedical Technology, Human Genetics and Wildlife Biology & Conservation, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, gujaratuniversity.org.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0634-0383
Krupali TrivediDepartment of Zoology, Biomedical Technology, Human Genetics and Wildlife Biology & Conservation, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, gujaratuniversity.org.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-2713
Nilam ParmarDepartment of Life Sciences, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, gujaratuniversity.org.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3202-4755
Bhakti PatelDepartment of Life Sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan, Gujarat, India, ngu.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3589-9097
Ashish PatelDepartment of Life Sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan, Gujarat, India, ngu.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4612-1724
Dipak Kumar SahooDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA, iastate.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3748-3395
Devendrasinh JhalaDepartment of Zoology, Biomedical Technology, Human Genetics and Wildlife Biology & Conservation, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, gujaratuniversity.org.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-6492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Methods: Extracts were subjected to physiochemical analysis (FTIR, GC-MS, and TLC/HPTLC), quantitative analysis (total phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin content), antioxidant activity (DPPH, ABTS, NO, and SO assays), toxicity (brine shrimp and hemolysis), and anticancer activity (MTT). Results: FTIR analysis revealed major functional groups in HME and fewer in HE. GC-MS analysis identified various compounds in HME, including estragole, beta-farnesene, alpha-bergamotene, alpha-copaene, eicosapentaenoic acid, and neophytadiene, while HE contained estragole, 1-heptatriacotanol, alpha-bergamotene, and tau-cadinol. TLC/HPTLC analysis reflects that both extracts contain complex mixtures of bioactive compounds. HME exhibited significantly higher levels of phenolics (122.72 ± 4.02 mg GAE/g), flavonoids (42.47 ± 0.59 mg QE/g), and tannins (30.91 ± 0.31 mg TAE/g) compared to HE (75.94 ± 0.93, 26.65 ± 1.17, and 1.99 ± 0.07 mg/g, respectively). In addition, HME exhibited significantly stronger antioxidant activity, as evidenced by lower IC Conclusion: Integrating metabolomics and pharmacognostic studies provided a comprehensive understanding of

Indexed as

anticancerantioxidantGC-MSin vitro toxicityOcimum basilicum L.

Identifiers

PMID41356576
PMCPMC12679484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.