ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
Effect of Postoperative Immobilization Method on Outcomes Following Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Transosseous Foveal Repair: Long-Arm Cast Versus Muenster Brace.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: The optimal postoperative immobilization method following triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal repair remains debated. While long-arm casting effectively restricts wrist rotation, it also limits elbow movement and may cause discomfort. The Muenster brace, which allows partial elbow flexion while restricting wrist rotation, has been proposed as an alternative. This study compared clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and complication rates between long-arm cast (LAC) and Muenster brace immobilization. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on 40 cases from 37 patients who underwent TFCC transosseous foveal repair between March 2021 and February 2024. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: the LAC group (n = 19) and the Muenster brace group (n = 21). Demographics, radiologic assessments, operative details, and pre- and postoperative functional outcomes were analyzed. Pain and function were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Patient satisfaction and complications were recorded. Results: The mean patient age was 29 years, with an average follow-up of 282 days. Preoperative VAS scores (6.3 ± 1.9) improved to 1.2 ± 1.4, and DASH scores improved from 52.6 ± 16.0 to 10.4 ± 12.4. No significant differences were found between groups in demographics, tear classification, operative time, or preoperative functional scores. Postoperative pain relief, functional improvement, grip strength, and satisfaction were comparable. Minor complications included 1 case of transient cubital tunnel syndrome and 1 case of persistent pain requiring revision in the LAC group. In the Muenster group, 1 patient sustained a traumatic re-injury, and another developed distal radioulnar joint instability. No infections, tendon ruptures, or severe stiffness occurred. Conclusions: Both immobilization methods yielded comparable outcomes and satisfaction. While the Muenster brace improves elbow mobility, its effectiveness in preventing retears was similar to that of LAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.