ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
Automatic Assessment of Radiological Parameters of the Distal Radius Using a Hybrid Approach Combining Deep Learning and a Computer-Aided Diagnostic Algorithm.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal data integration in orthopedic regenerative medicine: bridging imaging, omics, and clinical data.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: The use of deep learning algorithms in medical imaging has increased rapidly. This study aimed to develop an automated, hybrid approach combining a deep learning architecture and a conventional computer-aided diagnostic method to detect anatomical landmarks and measure radiological parameters in wrist radiography. Methods: Overall, 487 wrist radiographs were randomly sampled for training and validation, and 100 radiographs collected from 2 institutions were used as the test set. Anatomical landmarks for 4 commonly used parameters, namely, radial inclination (RI), radial length (RL), volar tilt (VT), and ulnar variance (UV), were identified and labeled. A 2-step hybrid method combining a deep learning model with conventional computer-aided diagnosis was developed to measure radiological parameters using these anatomical landmarks. Measurements were obtained from the test set. The mean value of each parameter determined by 2 hand surgeons served as the reference standard. The performance of the deep learning algorithm was evaluated using the successful detection rate (SDR), mean absolute error (MAE), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Pearson correlation coefficient ( Results: The SDR of the model ranged from 97% to 98% at the 1 mm threshold and 99% at the 2 mm threshold. The RI, RL, VT, and UV generated by the model were 26.41° ± 4.01°, 12.63 ± 2.72 mm, 14.01° ± 8.02°, and 2.09 ± 2.76 mm, respectively. The overall MAEs for RI, RL, VT, and UV between the manually and automatically measured parameter values were 1.62° ± 1.26°, 1.56 ± 1.23 mm, 1.88° ± 1.68°, and 0.43 ± 0.41 mm, respectively. In the correlation analysis, good or high reliability was observed for RI, VT, and UV (ICC: 0.86, 0.95, and 0.98; Conclusions: This novel automated hybrid method can accurately identify landmarks on wrist radiographs and automatically generate the radiological parameters of the distal radius. This method saves time and reduces human labor in creating datasets for training segmentation models and developing image processing algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.