Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41356513›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Don't You Know That I'm Toxic? Wild Birds Learn to Avoid a Novel Aposematic Warning Signal.

Samuel G Thompson, Steven J Portugal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel G ThompsonDepartment of Biological Sciences The University of Oxford Oxford Oxon UK.
Steven J PortugalDepartment of Biological Sciences The University of Oxford Oxford Oxon UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2438-2352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many prey species defend themselves against predators by sequestering toxins, which they advertise using conspicuous warning signals-a survival strategy termed 'aposematism'. It is common for predators to avoid attacking aposematic prey for this reason, however, neophobia towards novel prey items may also play a part in this decision. In this study, we deployed green (cryptic-morph) and black-and-yellow (aposematic-morph) pastry caterpillar models at a study site in the UK. All models were initially palatable; however black-and-yellow models were manipulated with quinine in later trials to be distasteful. When both model colours were palatable, predation increased steadily but neither model type showed a survival advantage over the other. In later trials, black-and-yellow models defended with quinine experienced lower predation rates than palatable green models. Predator foraging strategies and implications for the effectiveness of aposematism as a survival strategy are discussed. Other potential explainers for the predation rates observed, such as dietary conservatism and the arrival of juveniles, are also highlighted.

Indexed as

aposematismavoidance behaviourneophobiapredator learningquinine

Identifiers

PMID41356513
PMCPMC12675940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.