ReviewPeerJ2025
Process of heavy metal transport between soil and the atmosphere: a review.
Review in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metal levels in bat guano from Brazilian caves: insights into environmental contamination.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transport of heavy metals (HMs) (excluding Hg) between soil and the atmosphere significantly influences human production and life. This review systematically summarizes the processes involved in the wind erosion-driven transport of HMs from soil to the atmosphere and the partitioning of atmospheric HMs via atmospheric deposition, drawing on relevant literature analysis and synthesis. The results reveal that both soil and the atmosphere are sinks of HMs, influencing each other significantly. The transport of soil HMs to the atmosphere along with soil fugitive dust by wind force incorporates three pathways: the direct suspension of suspension-size aggregates, the collision and abrasion of creep-size and saltation-size aggregates, and the breakage or decomposition of creep-size aggregates. Conventional farming practices, elevated HM concentrations, and high wind speeds exacerbate soil HM emissions. However, the effects of soil organic matter (SOM) and clay on soil HM emission demonstrate dual characteristics. Atmospheric deposition has emerged as a significant source of soil HMs, with wet deposition predominating, except in arid and semiarid regions. Dry deposition is influenced by meteorological parameters and topographic profiles, whereas preceding weather and precipitation duration are other factors affecting for wet deposition. This process increases the exposure possibility and consequent exposure dosage of HMs to humans and crops, thereby amplifying the potential risks of HMs. Moreover, the capacity of atmospheric HMs for long-range wind-driven dispersal may leave remote and sensitive ecosystems that are increasingly vulnerable. Moreover, it concludes with a synthesis of the current challenges and discusses recommendations for future directions. Therefore, this review will have significant reference and guiding value for research in this field and is intended for researchers engaged in the migration of HMs in soil and atmosphere, the safe utilization of heavy metal contaminated soil, and regional background values of soil HMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.