ReviewPerspectives on medical education2025
Domination of Early Adopters: A Bibliometric Review of Team-Based Learning Research in Health Professions Education 2005-2024.
Review in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endless justification: A scoping review of team-based learning research in medical education.Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As team-based learning (TBL) has gained traction in health profession education (HPE), so too has TBL research expanded. However, to date, the literature lacks an overview of TBL research that could inform research and education practice by identifying patterns of scholarship productivity over time. To address this gap, the current study aimed to explore the temporal, geographical and intellectual influences within TBL in HPE research. Methods: Using a bibliometric approach, we investigated the geographical distribution of TBL research, the main influencers in TBL research over the last two decades, and the characteristics of the most cited and co-cited articles. Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory was employed as a heuristic framework to map and interpret the global trajectory of TBL research. Results: TBL has been widely adopted in the USA, followed by the Western Pacific and the Eastern Mediterranean. The number of outputs suggests less traction in other global regions. Generally, TBL research is characterised by many one-off publications in lower-impact journals. Only 5% of papers were cited 50 times or more. The scholars who first brought TBL into HPE continue to collaborate and have a significant impact, as evidenced by citations and productivity. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that TBL in HPE research has been driven by a group of early adopters. However, while TBL seems to be widely adopted, there is a relative lack of cumulative research on this topic. More qualitative work and collaboration sare needed to explicitly examine what drives the adoption and normalisation of TBL and new pedagogies in HPE globally, as well as associated research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.