ArticleJAMIA open2025
Using machine learning algorithms to optimize treatment with high-cost biologics in a national cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Biosimilars: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Prediction models using statistical or machine learning (ML) approaches can enhance clinical decision support tools. Infliximab (IFX), a biologic with a newly introduced biosimilar for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), presents an opportunity to evaluate these tools at time of biosimilar switch to predict disease flares. This study sought to evaluate real-world safety and effectiveness of nonmedical IFX biosimilar switch in a national US cohort of CD and UC patients, and to develop and compare interpretable models for predicting adverse clinical events among patients on maintenance IFX. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used administrative and clinical data from the National Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse. It included 2529 Veterans with CD or UC on maintenance IFX (2017-2020), either continuing originator IFX or switching to a biosimilar. The primary outcome was disease-related flare. Classification and survival models were developed using traditional and ML methods and assessed via receiver operating characteristic curve, precision-recall curve, and decision curve analysis. Results: In 2529 Veterans with CD or UC, biosimilar switch had low predictive importance across survival models. Objective laboratory-related information yielded the highest validation. Random forest+ (RF+) outperformed all other statistical and ML models. Prior flares and total health-care encounters were the 2 most important predictors, while hemoglobin was the top laboratory predictor. Conclusions: Prediction models, particularly RF+, may aid in optimizing biologic therapy for CD and UC by identifying patients at higher risk of flare following a biosimilar switch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.