Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41356355›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Generative AI-Enhanced Microcalcification Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Reducing False Positives with High Sensitivity.

Kyungsu Kim, Manisha Bahl, Adham Mahmoud Alkhadrawi, Young-Tak Kim, Synho Do

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyungsu KimSchool of Transdisciplinary Innovations, Interdisciplinary Programs in Artificial Intelligence & Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Manisha BahlSchool of Transdisciplinary Innovations, Interdisciplinary Programs in Artificial Intelligence & Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Adham Mahmoud AlkhadrawiSchool of Transdisciplinary Innovations, Interdisciplinary Programs in Artificial Intelligence & Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Tak KimSchool of Transdisciplinary Innovations, Interdisciplinary Programs in Artificial Intelligence & Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Synho DoSchool of Transdisciplinary Innovations, Interdisciplinary Programs in Artificial Intelligence & Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Development and Clinical Implementation of an Artificial Intelligence Tool to Predict Risk of Upgrade of Ductal Carcinoma In SituK08CA241365 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BAHL, MANISHA · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While generative AI shows promise across industries, its advantages over state-of-the-art segmentation AI in radiology remain unclear. This study addresses this gap by developing a generative AI model to refine calcification detection in full-field digital mammograms (FFDM), improving specificity while maintaining high sensitivity. A segmentation AI initially extracted calcification pixels, achieving 98.0% sensitivity but a low positive predictive value (PPV) of 3.2%. To enhance detection, our generative AI used the segmentation AI output as a structural prior, transforming calcification-positive pixels into calcification-free pixels and generating a corrected result by subtraction. Trained on true calcification-free regions, it categorized densities within and around each calcification as interior or exterior. Our approach improved PPV by 2.28-fold (from 3.2% to 7.3%), surpassing prior generative AI models by 146-fold (from 0.05% to 7.3%), while maintaining sensitivity above 95%. It also reduced patient-level detection errors for small calcifications (5.17-fold, from 27.43% to 5.31%), high-exterior density (4.20-fold, from 53.85% to 12.82%), and low-interior density (2.89-fold, from 63.95% to 22.09%). This study serves as a seminal reference, demonstrating generative AI's radiological significance beyond the latest segmentation models, with potential to redefine screening accuracy and generate high-fidelity virtual normal FFDM references.

Indexed as

Full-Field Digital MammographyGenerative AIMicrocalcificationRefinementUnsupervised Anomaly Detection

Identifiers

PMID41356355
PMCPMC12676427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.