ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2025
Public health implications of delayed diagnosis and treatment of optic neuritis in low-resource settings: a retrospective study of visual recovery outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advertising and large language models: a new frontier influencing medical practice.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optic neuritis (ON) is a common cause of visual loss in adults. It is commonly related to or occurs in the scenario of a demyelinating disease. Although treatment leads to visual recovery, diagnosis and treatment need to occur quickly, especially in lower-resource countries, where systems expect delays in care. Purpose: The goal of this study was to examine health-system delays in ON diagnosis and treatment and their effects on visual recovery. Methods: This retrospective review involved 100 cases of ON seen in a tertiary referral hospital from 2016 to 2023. Diagnosis was made of clinical features with confirmation by neuro-ophthalmological evaluation. MRI and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were obtained if they were within reach. Visual recovery was defined as improvement of ≥3 Snellen lines at 3 months. Patients were given intravenous methylprednisolone (1 g/day for 3-5 days) and a tapered course of oral prednisolone. Delayed treatment was defined as the start of corticosteroids > 14 days after symptom onset, which was established for patients who did not start steroids on initial presentation. Logistic regression and ROC analysis were used to determine predictors of complete recovery. Results: 58% of patients experienced delayed treatment and had lower rates of complete visual recovery (31.0% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.01). Delayed treatment (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21-0.89) and baseline poor BCVA independently predicted poor visual recovery. Conclusion: In low-resource settings, the short-term visual outcomes of ON are worse with a delay in management. Prompt initiation of corticosteroids and improved referral pathways may aid in maximizing the recovery rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.