ReviewArchives of physiotherapy
Is resistance training with external loads superior to unloaded exercise in the management of chronic low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic non-specific low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. While resistance training using external loads is common in rehabilitation, its added value over unloaded exercise remains uncertain, particularly across physical and psychological variables. Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022366975), included randomized controlled trials comparing externally loaded resistance training to unloaded exercise in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability. Secondary outcomes included back muscle endurance, maximal strength, fear-avoidance beliefs, and pain catastrophizing. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted, stratified by follow-up duration. Results: Thirteen randomized trials (778 participants) were included. At follow-up periods beyond seven weeks, externally loaded resistance training showed a small but statistically significant reduction in pain compared to unloaded exercise (mean difference = -0.52 on a 0-10 scale; 95% confidence interval [-0.92, -0.08]). No significant differences were found at short-term or post-washout follow-ups. Effects on disability were inconsistent and highly variable. Resistance training was associated with improvements in back muscle endurance and suggested a possible effect on long-term maximal strength, although wide prediction intervals prevent definitive conclusions. No meaningful differences were found for psychological variables, and pain catastrophizing was assessed in only one trial, limiting conclusions. Conclusion: Externally loaded resistance training is safe and feasible for chronic non-specific low back pain, but its effects on pain, disability and psychosocial outcomes are comparable to unloaded exercise. In line with the multifactorial nature of chronic pain, improvements appear driven more by exposure, adherence and therapeutic context than by load intensity alone. Exercise prescription should therefore remain individualized and embedded within a biopsychosocial framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.