ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Coronary Sinus Reducer: History, Current Applications, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Coronary Venous System in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronary sinus reducer (CSR) is a percutaneous device designed to improve coronary blood flow and alleviate symptoms of refractory angina in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) who are unsuitable for revascularization therapy. CSR originated from earlier surgical techniques, such as coronary sinus ligation (CSL), and functions by narrowing the coronary sinus to enhance perfusion in ischemic myocardial territories-particularly in the subendocardial regions-while also reducing microvascular resistance and increasing capillary recruitment. CSR is currently recognized as an effective treatment for patients with chronic refractory angina, especially those deemed ineligible for revascularization according to current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Moreover, emerging studies are expanding the understanding of the mechanism of action involved in CSR, demonstrating that this technique may also improve microvascular function, particularly in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction. These trials have shown significant improvements in coronary microcirculation and reductions in angina symptoms, suggesting that CSR may have therapeutic potential beyond obstructive CAD. Thus, CSR may represent a promising treatment option for microvascular ischemia, thereby broadening its clinical applicability to patients with angina/ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.