Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41356269›Full record

ArticleNPJ clean air2025

Constraints on the modeled vertical distribution of smoke during the 2020 western US wildfires from satellite data.

Mackenzie M Arnold, Pablo E Saide, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Kevin W Bowman, Jordan L Schnell, Ravan Ahmadov, Xi Chen, Jun Wang, Oscar A Neyra-Nazarrett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ clean air, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mackenzie M ArnoldDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Pablo E SaideDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Kazuyuki MiyazakiJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA.
Kevin W BowmanJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA.
Jordan L SchnellCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO USA.
Ravan AhmadovNOAA Global Systems Laboratory, Boulder, CO USA.
Xi ChenDepartment of Chemical & Biochemical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA.
Jun WangDepartment of Chemical & Biochemical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA.
Oscar A Neyra-NazarrettInstitute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As wildfires increase in frequency and intensity, accurately representing the vertical distribution of smoke in numerical models is critical for assessing impacts to air quality, but remains highly uncertain. In this study, we leverage satellite retrievals of total column carbon monoxide (CO) and aerosol layer height (ALH) to evaluate two state-of-the-art regionals and global models, one using a plume rise parameterization to estimate smoke injection height (RAP-Chem) and another placing smoke at the surface (MOMO-Chem). We introduce a novel metric that utilizes the differing vertical sensitivities of two satellite sensors observing CO (TROPOMI and CrIS) to infer the vertical distribution of wildfire smoke using a joint CO column ratio. We find that RAP-Chem better captures the distribution of CO and ALH related to the 2020 western US megafire event than MOMO-Chem. However, RAP-Chem underestimates surface CO concentrations, revealing that current plume rise parameterizations are limited in their ability to partition smoke correctly in the vertical column. These results show that synergistic use of satellite data can provide additional constraints on the vertical distribution of smoke, thus providing insights into the strengths and limitations of current plume rise parameterizations and a pathway to improvement.

Indexed as

Climate sciencesEnvironmental sciences

Identifiers

PMID41356269
PMCPMC12678182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.