ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Clinical and economic outcomes of myasthenia gravis and myasthenic crisis when treated with PLEX and IVIG.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder characterized by muscle weakness, with myasthenic crisis representing a life-threatening exacerbation requiring respiratory support. Acute treatment options include plasmapheresis (PLEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Prior studies have reported mixed results regarding the relative effectiveness of these therapies, although recent evidence suggests that PLEX may provide faster and more noticeable clinical improvement. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in clinical and economic outcomes among U.S. patients hospitalized for myasthenia gravis or crisis who received PLEX, IVIG, both, or neither treatment. Methods: Myasthenia gravis and crisis admissions from 2017 to 2022 were collected using the National Inpatient Sample. Admissions were categorized by treatment: IVIG, PLEX, both, or neither. To minimize selection bias, admissions were propensity-matched for IVIG and PLEX. Differences in mortality were evaluated using logistic regression models. Length of stay and inflation-adjusted total charge were assessed using linear regression models. Results: Most admissions received neither PLEX nor IVIG. Compared to treatment with neither, treatment with IVIG, PLEX, or both were not associated with significant differences in mortality; however, they were linked to longer hospital stays and higher total charge. A direct comparison of PLEX vs. IVIG revealed similar mortality and total charges, although length of stay was longer for PLEX. Older age was associated with increased mortality. Discussion: Although PLEX has been advocated as first-line therapy due to rapid clinical improvement, national data do not clearly indicate a superior treatment option, with similar mortality and total charges observed across therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.