ArticleJHLT open2026
Lung transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors over 55 years old: A national analysis of outcomes and utilization.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lungs from older donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are underutilized; however, these organs may represent an opportunity to expand the donor pool. Herein, we evaluated utilization and outcomes of lung transplants using lungs from older DCD donors. Methods: Using national data from 2016 to 2024, we identified all adult DCD donors and corresponding isolated lung transplant recipients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of lung utilization. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to compare graft survival between recipients of lungs from DCD donors <55 and ≥55 years. Results: Among 10,769 older (age ≥ 55) DCD donors identified, lungs were transplanted from only 302 (2.8%) with significant organ procurement organization- and center-level variation in use. Just one center exceeded 50 transplants using older DCD donors over the study period. Utilization increased over time (7 cases in 2016 vs 111 in 2024; Conclusions: Lungs from older DCD donors remain underutilized despite comparable outcomes. Their use is highly concentrated among a small number of centers and organ procurement organizations, suggesting that local behaviors and infrastructure strongly influence disposition. Broader adoption of ex-vivo lung perfusion and strategic recipient matching may support safe expansion of this untapped donor pool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.