ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
A comparative analysis of outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage based on surgical timing.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to investigate the optimal timing of intervention therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). This research aims to analyze the impact of early treatment and various intervention modalities on clinical outcomes in patients presenting with aSAH. Materials and methods: Patients with aSAH were analyzed for demographics, Fisher grading, WFNS grading, and Hunt-Hess grading. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) compared outcomes between groups receiving clamping or embolization within 12 h vs. later. Logistic regression evaluated factors affecting mRS prognosis at 3 months post-discharge. Results: This study included 226 patients, with 192 (85%) receiving embolization and 34 (15%) patients underwent clipping. 58 (26%) treated within 12 h of aSAH onset and 168 patients received treatment after 12 h. No significant mRS differences were found between clamping and embolization. Predictors of length of hospitalization were predicted by age, Modified Fisher classification, WFNS classification, Hunt-Hess classification, complications, and intervention time under 12 h. Early intervention <12 h significantly affected the favorable outcome of mRS (0-2) after at 3 months post-discharge; higher admission score, advanced age, and the presence of complications were associated with poor prognosis. Conclusion: Early treatment within 12 h leads to improved clinical outcomes over delayed treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.