ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
A rapid systematic scoping review of the levels of bacterial antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic use among people in contact with the criminal justice system.
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Healthcare Workers' Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors to Antibiotic Use, Including in Acne, and Antibiotic Resistance in English Correctional Facilities in 2024.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant public health threat. Individuals in contact with the criminal justice system, including individuals in custody, prisons, jails or youth offending institutions, may be particularly vulnerable due to living conditions, behaviours and pre-existing health issues. This review assesses bacterial AMR and antibiotic use in this population. Methods: A rapid systematic scoping review was conducted (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XHCFJ). Embase, Medline and Scopus were searched for studies published between 1 January 2010 and 28 September 2023. One author screened all records, with 10% dual screened. Included studies examined AMR bacteria or antibiotic use among people in contact with the criminal justice system (including people in custody, prisons, jails or youth offending institutes). Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and STROBE AMS checklist. Findings were synthesized narratively as evidence was limited and heterogeneous, which prohibited planned meta-analyses. Results: Sixteen papers met inclusion criteria; eight were at lower risk of bias. Three studies examined antibiotic use, reporting common inappropriate prescribing ( Conclusions: People in contact with the criminal justice system face heightened risks of resistant bacterial infections. However, with only three studies addressing antibiotic use, evidence is limited. Addressing AMR in this group requires collaborative and targeted public health interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.