ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2023
Real-Time 3-D Video Reconstruction for Guidance of Transventricular Neurosurgery.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-Supervised Feature Detection and 3D Reconstruction for Real-Time Neuroendoscopic Guidance.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Model-based individual life-spanning documentation in visceral surgery: a proof of concept.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroendoscopic approach to deep-brain targets imparts deformation of the ventricles and adjacent parenchyma, limiting the accuracy of conventional neuronavigation. We report a method for 3D endoscopic reconstruction and registration via simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) for real-time guidance with or without robotic assistance. The aim is to permit augmented video overlay of structures registered from preoperative or intraoperative 3D images within and beyond the endoscopic field of view for more accurate targeting in the presence of deep-brain deformation. Phantom studies were performed to evaluate geometric accuracy and uncertainty in distinct scenarios of limited data (feature sparsity and scene occlusion), demonstrating performance over a broad range of challenges to endoscopic data. Reconstruction and registration accuracy were maintained even with up to 40% loss in feature density or 120° of the visual scene occluded. Overall, the method achieved a high degree of geometric accuracy, with target registration error of 1.02 mm and runtime supporting real-time guidance (3.45 Hz, representing a >16× speedup with SLAM approach compared to previous work). The studies establish essential quantitative performance characteristics and validation that are essential to future translation to clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.