ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
A novel approach to promote upper-limb motor recovery in stroke survivors using assistive myoelectric control and adaptive visual feedback in virtual reality.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myoelectric control may offer an engaging and effective modality for post-stroke rehabilitation. By translating residual muscle activity into control signals for virtual or robotic interfaces, it enables patients to actively participate in therapeutic tasks, even when voluntary movement is limited. However, stroke patients often exhibit abnormal muscle activation patterns, which can limit the effectiveness of such approaches. To address this, we developed a novel assistive-adaptive algorithm designed to enhance myoelectric control by promoting the learning of more functional and physiologically plausible muscle activation patterns. The algorithm operates by projecting the patient's instantaneous muscle activity onto reference patterns, each associated with a specific movement direction. These reference patterns are selected to minimize co-contraction while maintaining high similarity to physiological muscle patterns. The output of the projection determines the direction of the assistive force provided within a virtual isometric reaching task, while the level of assistance is modulated in real-time to progressively stimulate active participation, a key factor for promoting neuroplasticity. We evaluated the system through pilot experiments with three chronic stroke patients, focusing on changes in movement planning and accuracy and on the alignment toward physiological activation patterns. Our results revealed heterogeneous but promising trends, with three participants demonstrating improvements across multiple metrics after short exposure to the assistive algorithm. Specifically, higher similarity of muscle patterns to healthy participants was often aligned with better motor performance. These findings support the feasibility of using projection-based EMG assistance to guide patients toward more effective muscle recruitment strategies. The proposed framework establishes a foundation for future longitudinal studies aimed at testing whether such short-term adaptations can consolidate into lasting neuromuscular changes, potentially enhancing functional recovery through repeated and targeted exposure to myoelectric assistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.