ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Pacemaker-induced apnoea in a patient with cervical medullary trauma: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Phrenic nerve capture is a well-known complication of pacemaker (PM) implantation. In contrast, vagus nerve stimulation resulting in apnoea has not been previously described. We report a unique case of pacing-induced apnoea, likely due to stimulation of vagal afferents during atrial lead capture. Case summary: A 65-year-old man was admitted following a C3-C4 spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia. The patient developed complete third-degree heart block followed by asystolic cardiac arrest, complicated by ventricular tachycardia during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.After return of spontaneous circulation, a temporary single-chamber PM with a screw-in lead was inserted without complication. Transthoracic echocardiography showed a left ventricular dysfunction. The aetiology of the initial syncope remained unexplained (a primary arrhythmia could not be ruled out) and a permanent dual-chamber defibrillator was implanted. The right ventricular lead was placed at the apex and the right atrial lead at the right atrial appendage. During intraprocedural atrial lead testing, the patient presented a sudden drop in respiratory rate followed by apnoea. This event was reproducibly triggered by atrial capture. Relocation of the atrial lead to the right atrial lateral wall resolved the apnoea, which did not recur. Discussion: This case describes dual-chamber defibrillator implantation in a patient with cervical spinal cord trauma, who developed sudden apnoea associated with atrial capture. This may have inadvertently stimulated the vagus nerve, sending an inhibitory signal to the brain stem, resulting in a sudden respiratory rate drop. Although rare, this phenomenon should be considered when implanting pacing systems in patients with high cervical injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.