ArticleBig data & society
Information, collaboration, regulation: Physician and AI researcher views on ethical considerations in clinical AI integration.
Article in Big data & society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Do Physicians Trust AI? The Role of Clinical Context in Decision Support: SMART vignette study.Research square · 2026Article
- Ethical Governance of Large Language Models in Health Care: Trust, Responsibility, and Equity in Routine Use.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Online survey assessing US primary care physicians' attitudes toward AI use in clinical administrative tasks.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence literacy in nursing: a concept analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the potential scope and impact of artificial intelligence's (AI's) adoption in medicine, a comprehensive assessment of the potential ethical considerations arising during clinical integration is needed. Existing ethical frameworks and principles have aided in the identification of ethical considerations that may arise during the clinical integration of AI, however, our understanding of these considerations remains preliminary to the extent that it is not yet robustly informed by empirical research on key stakeholders' experiences and perspectives. Utilizing a qualitative descriptive approach, we completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with physicians (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.