ArticleEcology2025
Measuring competition coefficients in an ant community: Implications for intraspecific adaptation load.
Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the stable coexistence of species despite resource competition has been a central topic in ecology. Ant communities are particularly enigmatic as various species coexist despite resource overlap. Community ecology theory predicts stable species coexistence when intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition, but due to their perennial and underground life, competition coefficients of ants have never been rigorously measured in the field. We tackled this problem by studying Diacamma cf. indicum, which allows for noninvasive mark-recapture of whole colonies. Several ant species coexisted at the study site where Diacamma was most abundant, and baiting experiments and stable isotope analyses suggested overlapping food niches. Consistently, per worker brood production of Diacamma colonies was significantly negatively correlated with con- and heterospecific worker densities within the foraging area, suggesting exploitative competition among the ants. In terms of net population growth, however, the estimated intraspecific competition coefficient was about five times larger than the interspecific competition coefficient. This is possibly because exploitative competition for food occurs both intra- and interspecifically, whereas interference competition occurs mostly among conspecifics. Indeed, for Diacamma worker survival, there was a significant (nonlinear) negative correlation only with the density of conspecific colonies within the foraging area. This is consistent with the observation that Diacamma rarely fought with other species, although it violently attacked conspecific aliens encountered in their nest vicinity. We interpreted these results in light of the recent theory of intraspecific adaptation load. This theory predicts that density-dependent adaptation to intraspecific conflict can intensify intraspecific competition and act to suppress per capita population growth in dominant species, thereby leading to species coexistence with overlapping resources. Our inclusive fitness model suggests that the intraspecific territorial aggression in Diacamma may be a counter-adaptation to intraspecific conflict, that is, brood abduction between conspecific colonies. This aggression pattern can cause the observed density-dependent worker mortality. Our population dynamic model indicates that such density-dependent excess mortality acting on dominant competitors can promote stable coexistence with subordinate competitors. Overall, our results support the intraspecific adaptation load theory that aims at integrating behavioral and community ecology to understand how adaptation interacts with population and community dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.