ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Implementation and Impact of a Dermoscopy-Enabled Dermatology eConsult Application in Primary Care.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectivesPrimary care providers (PCPs) can help fill gaps in access to dermatology care using eConsults to collaborate asynchronously with dermatologists. Many dermatology eConsult programs face challenges with image acquisition, image quality, lack of dermoscopy and complicated, time-consuming workflows that limit primary care acceptance.
methodsThis quality improvement study used the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. We introduced a dermoscopy-enabled dermatology eConsult device and application (DermLoop) to PCPs at a statewide Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) and compared dermatology referrals during the 9-month periods pre-DermLoop versus post-DermLoop.
resultsSixty-nine PCPs at 16 practice sites submitted 560 DermLoop eConsults for 526 unique patients. After being trained to use DermLoop PCPs (n = 65) submitted a higher proportion of dermatology referral requests as eConsults rather than face-to-face visit (28.6% vs 17.3%,
conclusionBroad adoption of DermLoop eConsults helped provide effective dermatology care to Medicaid-insured and uninsured patients who may otherwise have been unable to obtain care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.