Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41355527›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Building and Boosting Capitals for Health Care Access: A Qualitative Study of Homeless Health Peer Advocacy in London, UK.

Andy Guise, P J Annand, Paniz Hosseini, Spike Hudson, Sujit D Rathod, Lucy Platt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andy GuisePopulation Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0981-4663
P J AnnandCentre for Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Paniz HosseiniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Spike HudsonCommunity Consultants Ltd, London, UK.
Sujit D RathodDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lucy PlattDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research PHSEZO60
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer support is widely promoted as enabling health care access with people experiencing homelessness, including through enabling independence, empowering individuals and managing stigma. However, there is little understanding of these processes, including how they relate to the wide range of potential activities involved in peer support. We studied peer support within a peer advocacy service at a charity run by and for people experiencing homelessness in London, UK. We report analysis from a sub-set of qualitative interviews and focus groups gathered for a qualitative study of peer advocacy. We include interviews that offered insight to particular cases of peer advocacy. These interviews came from 23 clients of the service, 6 peer advocates, 1 staff member and 2 stakeholders. We drew on Bourdieu's theory of capitals to develop a typology of different ways peer support works. The findings focus on reporting three types of experiences: where peer support builds cultural health capital amongst service clients, boosts cultural health capital, social and economic capital, and third, where boosting social and economic capital are priorities. The discussion considers how the analysis helps conceptualise processes of peer support with respect to empowerment, independence and stigma management.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityIll-Housed PersonsPeer GroupSocial SupportAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicLondonMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Stigma

Identifiers

PMID41355527
PMCPMC12683470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.