ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2026
ECG Markers of Positive Drug Challenge With Ajmaline in Patients With Brugada Syndrome.
Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAjmaline challenge (AC) is used for diagnosing suspected Brugada syndrome (BS) in patients with unexplained syncope, survived cardiac arrest, or for family screening. PURPOSE: To evaluate baseline ECG markers predicting a positive AC in the absence of a spontaneous diagnostic Brugada ECG.
methodsBaseline ECGs of 221 consecutive patients undergoing AC (up to 1 mg/kg bodyweight) were analyzed. ECGs from positive and negative tests were compared, with Q-, R-, S-, J-, and T-wave amplitudes and intervals measured in all 12 leads.
results221 patients underwent AC; the cohort was 71% male, and 7% had survived cardiac arrest. AC was positive in 93 patients (42%). Prominent S-waves in lead II and J-waves in V1 predicted a positive AC (S-wave duration: 36 vs. 22 ms, p < 0.01; J-wave amplitude V1: 0.06 vs. 0.01 mV, p < 0.001). ROC analysis confirmed discriminative value for S-wave duration in lead II (AUC 0.79) and J-wave amplitude in V1 (AUC 0.71). A cut off of ≥ 19 ms for S-wave duration in lead II showed 96% sensitivity for a positive test (OR 17.3, p < 0.001). J-wave amplitude in V1 ≥ 0.05 mV was also significantly associated (OR 5.4, p < 0.001).
conclusionIn patients without a spontaneous diagnostic Brugada ECG, prominent S-waves in lead II and J-waves in V1 are subtle electrical abnormalities that help identify patients and family members with a higher likelihood of positive AC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.