Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41355435›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle international2026

Long-term Consequences of Total Ankle Replacement vs Ankle Fusion in England: A 25-Year National Population Study of 41 000 patients.

Conor Hennessy, Simon Abram, Rick Brown, Constantinos Loizou, Robert Sharp, Adrian Kendal

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Conor HennessyFoot and Ankle Research Group Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Simon AbramNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rick BrownFoot and Ankle Research Group Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Constantinos LoizouFoot and Ankle Research Group Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Robert SharpFoot and Ankle Research Group Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Adrian KendalFoot and Ankle Research Group Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2208-0246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitive and successful treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis is either total ankle replacement (TAR) or ankle fusion (AF). The long-term implications of both treatments remain unclear. AF may predispose patients to subsequent hindfoot joint fusion, and TAR potentially risks high rates of complex revision surgery. The study investigates the risks of further surgery, adjacent joint surgery, and rare but serious complications following AF and TAR.

methodsAn England population cohort study was performed using the Hospital Episode Statistics database, linked to Office of National Statistics (ONS) mortality data (1998-2023). The primary outcome was Kaplan-Meier curve analysis of revision surgery-free survival of TAR vs AF. Secondary outcome measures were the rates of adjacent joint/hindfoot fusion, any further re-intervention to the ankle, peri-operative mortality, 90-day complications, and serious adverse events.

resultsA total of 10 335 TARs and 30 704 AFs were analyzed. The AF revision rate was significantly lower than TAR at all time points including 5 years (2% vs 6.1%, relative risk [RR] 0.12, 95% CI 0.10-0.16), 10 years (2.5% vs 10.2%, RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.08-0.18), and 20 years (3.1% vs 13.55%, RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.23). There was no significant difference in the 25-year risk of adjacent joint fusion following AF (8.64%, 95% CI 7.79%-9.58%) vs TAR (6.82%, 95% CI 5.36% to 8.66%). TAR was associated with higher risks of intra-operative fracture (0.42% vs 0.10%, RR=4.35) and re-intervention for wound infection (0.26% vs 0.15%, RR 1.74) but a lower observed 90-day pulmonary embolus rate than AF (0.23% vs 0.58% respectively).

conclusionBoth TAR and AF are definitive treatments of ankle arthritis with low peri-operative risk. In this England-wide registry cohort, TAR showed higher cumulative revision risk than AF over long-term follow-up. Estimates at the furthest time points have lower certainty. Furthermore, AF did not appear to pre-dispose patients to hindfoot fusion and was not associated with a higher 25-year rate of hindfoot fusion than TAR. These estimates do not capture joint degeneration managed non-operatively.

Indexed as

Ankle JointArthrodesisArthroplasty, Replacement, AnkleAdultAgedArthritisCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationanklearthritisfusionhindfootpopulationreplacementrevision

Identifiers

PMID41355435
PMCPMC12754028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.