ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2026
Standardised Request and Contrast Consent Forms to Enhance Clinical Learning in Radiography Education.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-Procedural Safety Screening in Diagnostic Imaging Across England: A Freedom of Information Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe skill of interpreting medical imaging request and contrast consent forms is integral to student learning and assessing clinical preparedness for practice. This study sought to develop standardised Medical Imaging Suite (MIS) forms using publicly available data on these types of medical documentation. The standardised MIS forms can be integrated into the diagnostic radiography curriculum for undergraduate and postgraduate students and embedded into practical classes, tutorials, simulations and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to better prepare students for clinical documentation tasks and enhance the student learning experience.
methodsOpen-source medical imaging request forms (n = 30) and contrast consent forms (n = 6) were collected from various radiology providers. The key field components of these forms were analysed using qualitative content analysis to identify essential elements and inform the development of standardised MIS forms.
resultsThe forms were sourced from 25 distinct medical imaging providers. Recurring key fields, such as patient details, examination type, clinical history and referrer information, were identified and incorporated into the MIS form templates. This analysis revealed consistent core elements across providers, informing the structure and content of two educational tools. Pregnancy checks were included in only seven request forms and all six contrast consent forms. All contrast consent forms provided background on contrast media injection and risks and checked for renal conditions and diabetes. Other common conditions included asthma (n = 5), thyroid disease (n = 4) and cardiac issues (n = 3).
conclusionStandardised MIS forms, modelled on real-world radiology documentation, provide a structured and authentic learning resource within radiography education. Their implementation supports the development of student competencies in communication, documentation and clinical reasoning, while also highlighting the potential for wider adoption across institutions seeking consistent documentation practices. This, in turn, better prepares students for professional practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.