ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Tri-trophic consequences of plant-to-plant volatile signalling and its contingency on plant relatedness in wild cotton.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPlant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) induced by herbivory boost defences in neighbouring plants. These effects have been shown primarily for direct plant defences and are often stronger when emitter and receiver plants are genetically related. However, we know much less about how plant indirect defence is affected by VOC signalling. To address this, we conducted field experiments controlling for plant relatedness, testing the effects of VOC signalling on extrafloral nectar (EFN) production, a key indirect defence, and its impact on ant recruitment and attacks on herbivores of wild cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) plants.
methodsExperiments consisted of plant triplets, in which one individual acted as an emitter of VOCs and two as receivers. One receiver shared the same mother plant as the emitter, and the other was descended from a different mother. Half of the emitter plants were induced using the specialist caterpillar Alabama argillacea, and VOCs were collected. We then induced receivers and measured their EFN production, in addition to ant abundance and attack on sentinel caterpillars. We also subsequently excluded ants from half of the receivers to test for ant-mediated effects on natural herbivory occurring over the following weeks. KEY
resultsReceivers exposed to VOCs of damaged emitters produced a greater volume and concentration of EFN in response to herbivory relative to those exposed to undamaged emitters and, accordingly, showed higher rates of ant attack on sentinel caterpillars (albeit no differences in ant abundance). These effects were not contingent on emitter-receiver relatedness. In addition, we found no effect of ant exclusion on natural herbivory levels on receiver plants, although damage was low overall.
conclusionsThese findings provide insight into inter-plant VOC signalling effects on multitrophic interactions by revealing indirect defence induction that leads to herbivore reduction by ants but that such effect occurs independently of the degree of emitter-receiver relatedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.