Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41355272›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of medical education2025

A narrative review of social media guidelines for medical doctors: insights for developing framework in Vietnam.

Thi Kim Chi Dang, Byung-Il Yeh, Yon Chul Park, Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen, Bui Bao Hoang, Khanh Vinh, Kyung Hye Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thi Kim Chi DangUndergraduate Training Office, Skills Lab Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Byung-Il YehDepartment of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Yon Chul ParkDepartment of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Vu Quoc Huy NguyenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Bui Bao HoangDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Khanh VinhUndergraduate Training Office, Skills Lab Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Kyung Hye ParkDepartment of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

Funding

Korea International Health and Medical Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of social media among medical doctors and students has raised concerns about the issues related to professional behaviors in online environment. This study examines the current global guidelines on social media use for medical doctors to inform the development of such framework for Vietnamese medical doctors. A narrative review was conducted through manual searches of the official websites of national medical governing bodies. Thematic analysis was conducted on the documents to identify key principles and themes. As results, 10 guidelines, including one from World Medical Association and nine from governing bodies in nine countries were reviewed. Five key common themes were identified, including patient confidentiality, privacy, and dignity; information appropriateness; professional boundary, doctor-patient relationship, public trust; practitioner's privacy; and health advocacy. These perspectives should be reflected together with Vietnamese cultural context when developing guidelines on professional use of social media for medical doctors in Vietnam. Detailed practical examples, clear expectations, potential disciplinary actions, and guidance on the beneficial use of social media should be included as essential components of the guidelines.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicPhysiciansSocial MediaConfidentialityHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPrivacyTrustVietnamGuidelinesMedical doctorsProfessionalismSocial media

Identifiers

PMID41355272
PMCPMC12683260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.