ArticleKorean journal of medical education2025
A satisfaction-focused CIPP evaluation of Mongolia's undergraduate occupational therapy program: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Korean journal of medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated Mongolia's undergraduate occupational therapy program using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model, drawing on feedback from students, alumni, faculty, and program managers to understand its current state and identify areas for improvement.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey using the CIPP evaluation model. The model-based questionnaire requested responses using a Likert scale from 1 to 5. Responses were collected from 34 students, 19 alumni, 24 faculty members, and five program management team members. They were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive and inferential statistics.
resultsAll participants expressed satisfaction with the context, process, and product components of the occupational therapy program, with scores of 3.4 or higher. For the input component, the faculty members and program managers gave satisfactory ratings, while the students and alumni gave neutral ratings, on average. There was a significant difference between the average input scores of the first-year and third-year students, and between the first-year and fourth-year students (p<0.05). Lecturers teaching basic professional subjects rated the program's inputs higher than those teaching general subjects. On average, the students rated the program's "context" higher than alumni, while faculty members rated "input" higher than both students and alumni. Additionally, the program's managers rated "input" higher than the students (p<0.05).
conclusionThe occupational therapy program in Mongolia has been improving annually. While it is generally rated as "satisfactory," there is a need for enhanced resources to better support the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.