Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41355262›Full record

ArticleInternational neurourology journal2025

Radiomics Reproducibility in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Based on PROSTATEx.

Sumin Jung, Jae-Seoung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International neurourology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sumin JungCore Research & Development Center, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.
Jae-Seoung KimCore Research & Development Center, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to extract radiomics features from prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), evaluate their reproducibility, and determine whether machine learning (ML) models built on reproducible features can noninvasively diagnose prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsWe analyzed prostate MRI from 82 subjects (41 PCa and 41 controls) in the public PROSTATEx dataset. From T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, 215 features per sequence were extracted (T2WI 215; ADC 215; total 430). Reproducibility within each sequence was quantified after repeated segmentation using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 2-way random-effects, absolute-agreement model. Only shared features with ICC≥0.75 in both T2WI and ADC were retained. Selected features were normalized and combined via early fusion into a single input vector. Redundant features were eliminated by Pearson correlation analysis (|r|>0.9).

resultsReproducible radiomics features (ICC≥0.75) were key contributors to model performance. Using these features, support vector machine, neural network, and logistic regression models achieved accuracies of 80%-84% and a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 under 5-fold cross-validation. Principal component analysis yielded the most consistent results, whereas several nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods produced variable outcomes across classifiers.

conclusionCombining reproducible MRI radiomics features with dimensionality reduction and ML offers a robust noninvasive approach for PCa diagnosis. Emphasizing reproducibility enhances model performance and reliability, supporting potential clinical translation.

Indexed as

Machine learningMagnetic resonance imagingProstatic neoplasmsRadiomicsReproducibility of results

Identifiers

PMID41355262
PMCPMC12688314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.