Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41355257›Full record

ArticleInternational neurourology journal2025

Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Treatment Failure in Neurourology: From Automated Urodynamics to Precision Management.

Seunghyun Youn, Beom Jin Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International neurourology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seunghyun YounGRK Partners Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
Beom Jin ParkDepartment of Radiology and Advanced Medical Imaging Institute, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Health and Welfare RS-2022-KH129263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool for advancing diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning in neurourology. This review synthesizes recent progress in AI-based models for predicting treatment failure in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Machine learning and deep learning algorithms applied to urodynamic, clinical, and neuroimaging data have demonstrated strong potential to identify patients at risk of therapeutic nonresponse and improve individualized management. Automated systems now enable precise interpretation of complex bladder signals, multimodal data integration, and real-time prediction of treatment outcomes, marking a shift toward data-driven precision medicine. Nevertheless, most published studies remain limited by small, single-center datasets and a lack of external validation. Broader clinical adoption will require multicenter collaboration, adherence to standardized reporting frameworks such as TRIPOD-ML and PROBAST-AI, and integration of explainable AI to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and clinician trust.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceNeurogenic bladderNeurourologyPrecision medicinePredictive modelingTreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID41355257
PMCPMC12688317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.