ArticleInternational neurourology journal2025
Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Treatment Failure in Neurourology: From Automated Urodynamics to Precision Management.
Article in International neurourology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in neurosurgery: A critical appraisal of established practices, ongoing controversies, and future trajectories.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2026Review
- A narrative review of AI monitoring in postoperative pain management and functional rehabilitation for spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool for advancing diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning in neurourology. This review synthesizes recent progress in AI-based models for predicting treatment failure in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Machine learning and deep learning algorithms applied to urodynamic, clinical, and neuroimaging data have demonstrated strong potential to identify patients at risk of therapeutic nonresponse and improve individualized management. Automated systems now enable precise interpretation of complex bladder signals, multimodal data integration, and real-time prediction of treatment outcomes, marking a shift toward data-driven precision medicine. Nevertheless, most published studies remain limited by small, single-center datasets and a lack of external validation. Broader clinical adoption will require multicenter collaboration, adherence to standardized reporting frameworks such as TRIPOD-ML and PROBAST-AI, and integration of explainable AI to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and clinician trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.