Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41355026›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026

Trade-offs across life history stages and social association types shape winter communal roosting in a long-lived raptor.

Benedetta Catitti, Lorenz P Mindt, Adrian Aebischer, Martin U Grüebler, Birgit C Schlick-Steiner, Florian M Steiner, Urs G Kormann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benedetta CatittiSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4018-7300
Lorenz P MindtSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.
Adrian AebischerImpasse du Castel 20, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Martin U GrüeblerSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4468-8292
Birgit C Schlick-SteinerMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-5778
Florian M SteinerMolecular Ecology Group, Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-4650
Urs G KormannSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-4836

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_212469Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_169668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interactions among conspecifics can have significant fitness implications, but how social behaviours develop in wild animals remains poorly understood. Here, we examine the intrinsic drivers of a social behaviour, communal winter roosting, in red kites Milvus milvus. In this species, communal roosting is a facultative behaviour, and the mechanisms underlying its emergence at the individual and population levels are unclear. Through longitudinal GPS tracking of 635 bird-winters from 216 red kites, we derived multi-year roosting histories to investigate (i) which individual characteristics associate with the decision to join communal roosts, (ii) how these patterns change across life stages and (iii) whether roost composition reflects assortative associations among breeding pairs or kin. Based on 33,930 nights across six consecutive winters on the breeding grounds, we identified red kites from our tagged sample joining communal roosts on average 38% of the time. Males occurred more at communal roosts than females, but in both sexes this probability drastically decreased with age and additionally decreased once they started breeding. These ontogenetic changes in communal roosting behaviour were driven by behavioural plasticity at the individual level rather than selective mortality. Red kites displayed assortative behaviour both in communal and non-communal roosting contexts. Breeding pairs showed the strongest affiliation, roosting more often together than expected by chance in non-communal roosting sites, when in proximity to their breeding territory. In contrast, sibling and parent-offspring dyads were rare, and roosting less frequently together than expected by chance within communal roosts. Overall, our results show that the structure of communal roosts in the red kite is shaped by the age, sex and social relationships of individuals. The influence of these factors may stem from trade-offs across various life history stages, driven by changes in the net benefits associated with foraging, territory and mate prospecting, as well as territory maintenance throughout an individual's life.

Indexed as

FalconiformesNesting BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleLife History TraitsMaleSeasonsbehavioural plasticitycommunal roostforaging, life historyoverwinteringred kitessocial informationtrade‐offs

Identifiers

PMID41355026
PMCPMC12957718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.