ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Orthogonal validation of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) immunohistochemistry with molecular analysis for ALK gene rearrangement is required to finetune staining protocols with the D5F3 clone and can impact external quality assessment.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: AcralFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is used to screen tumours for ALK gene rearrangements, which generally result in ALK protein overexpression, depending on the fusion partner. Here, an interlaboratory validation of three IHC protocols using the D5F3 clone was performed. ALK IHC results were retrospectively compared with available molecular data on ALK fusions for 462 tumours, as part of an internal quality assessment. ALK IHC was read as 'negative', 'equivocal', or 'positive'. Two ALK IHC protocols showed increased staining intensity in the appendiceal myenteric plexus, but they also introduced diffuse, weak cytoplasmic staining in most non-ALK-rearranged epithelial and mesenchymal tumours, leading to equivocal or false-positive ALK IHC readout. One less sensitive protocol was more specific, as it showed good concordance with the molecular data, without extensive background staining: 33 of 34 ALK-rearranged tumours were positive (97% sensitivity), and 363 of 428 lesions without ALK fusions were negative (85% specificity). The negative and positive predictive values were 99% and 34%, respectively. Three of 58 equivocal tumours (5%) were ALK-rearranged, in contrast with 30 out of 40 positive tumours (75%). Despite its good concordance with ALK rearrangements, and thus good sensitivity, external quality assessment repeatedly considered this protocol as insufficiently sensitive. Our validation study shows that overly sensitive ALK IHC assays could result in false-positive tumours presenting with difficult-to-read focal or diffusely weak immunoreactivity, which could lead to potential overuse of confirmatory molecular tests. We therefore recommend carefully fine-tuning ALK IHC assays with the D5F3 clone by comparing diagnostic performance with molecular data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41354989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.