ReviewProtoplasma2026
Precision editing to improve fruit traits: CRISPR/Cas into the picture.
Review in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop growth, quality, and yield can be adversely affected by various biotic and abiotic stresses. Crop characteristics can be improved with conventional breeding and other variation-based breeding strategies. However, these strategies are time as well as resource consuming and to overcome this, novel approaches are necessary. CRISPR/Cas technique allows to improve desired traits more efficiently and accurately by targeting specific genes. Genome editing has become more versatile with CRISPR/Cas systems and is a valuable tool to protect food security by developing commercial crops optimized for yield and nutritional quality. Researchers are able to target and edit stress response pathway genes to develop crops with increased tolerance to stress. A lack of regeneration protocols and sufficient genome sequencing data has restricted fruit editing to only a few fruits (tomatoes, citrus, apple, kiwi, banana, grapes, strawberries, watermelon, etc.). This review is focused on CRISPR/Cas applications on the nutritional aspects of fruit engineering along with the challenges and opportunities. Another aspect which will be covered is the use of CRISPR/Cas technology to improve fruit resilience to biotic and abiotic stress, but not at the cost of yield. We discuss the pros and cons of using this technology, such as unintended effects on fruit traits or public concerns about GMOs. We conclude that the application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has the potential to be of great benefit to the agricultural industry not only to improve nutritional aspects but also to help reduce crop losses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41354981What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.