ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Stage-specific EMG feature optimization for enhanced post-stroke hand gesture recognition.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEMG-based hand-gesture recognition can enable home-based post-stroke rehabilitation, yet one-size-fits-all feature sets overlook differences across recovery stage
methodsThirteen post-stroke participants performed seven gestures while EMG was recorded from six forearm sensors. From 38 time- and frequency-domain features, we derived stage-specific subsets for Low (Brunnstrom 1-2, minimal movement), Medium (3-4, partial movement), and High (5-6, near-normal movement) using a wrapper approach Sequential Forward Selection (SFS). For reference, we included a filter comparison using minimum Redundancy-Maximum Relevance (mRMR). To provide fair baselines, we reproduced two literature feature sets within an identical Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) pipeline: (i) a healthy-cohort feature set and (ii) a patient-cohort feature set that was not stage-stratified and did not focus on feature selection (we adopted the features as reported). Multiple classifiers-Linear Discriminant Analysis, Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, LightGBM, Logistic Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbors-were evaluated via group-wise cross-validation. Within-stage variability was quantified using pairwise Jaccard overlap of selected features.
resultsStage-tailored subsets achieved compact yet accurate models: High = 81.5% (14 features, LightGBM), Medium = 80.2% (9 features, LightGBM), Low = 65.0% (7 features, Random Forest). SFS exceeded the mRMR filter comparison and outperformed both literature baselines under the same LightGBM pipeline (paired tests across CV folds, [Formula: see text]). Relative to the healthy-cohort baseline, gains were +6.5% (High), +6.2% (Medium), and +12.0% (Low); relative to the non-stage-stratified patient baseline, gains were +9.5%, +10.2%, and +21.0%, respectively. Time-domain metrics-particularly Difference Absolute Standard Deviation Value and Sample Entropy were most frequently selected. Jaccard analyses indicated within-stage heterogeneity alongside convergence on a small set of core discriminative features.
conclusionsBrunnstrom stage-specific feature engineering substantially improves EMG gesture-classification accuracy over both healthy-derived and non-stage-stratified patient baselines while reducing computational load. These findings support adaptive, stage-aware designs for wearable rehabilitation systems and motivate larger Low-stage cohorts and models robust to sparse or low-SNR signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.