Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41354941›Full record

ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2026

Hearing voices and the quest for autonomy: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Sepinood Noroozi, Nastaran Doroud, Eleanor Longden, Neil Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sepinood NorooziCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5763-4679
Nastaran DoroudNursing and Allied Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-9918
Eleanor LongdenPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-9697
Neil ThomasCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7006-6361

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program ScholarshipNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Development and Skills Enhancement Award NIHR301598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHearing voices is often experienced as being controlling, powerful, threatening or critical. This study aimed to examine the lived experiences of autonomy among people who hear voices.

designEmploying a qualitative design, this study sought to examine the personal narratives and meaning-making processes of voice hearers and gain deeper insights into the nuanced ways autonomy is experienced, diminished, attempted, re-established and constructed by those who hear voices.

methodIn-depth semi-structured phenomenological interviews with six voice hearers were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis to capture the ways participants interpret and respond to their experiences.

resultsParticipants' accounts revealed that autonomy was continuously negotiated, requiring reflection, adaptation and self-regulation. Three superordinate themes were identified in the data. First, participants reflected on how hearing voices challenged their sense of self, individuality and the space available for self-authorship. As such, developing a personally meaningful narrative was crucial for re-establishing autonomy. Second, they portrayed a co-existing dynamic where autonomy and power were shared and negotiated with voices. Third, participants described how hearing voices interfered with their perceived competence, and decision-making, introducing limitations to their ability to navigate life on their own terms. Participants' capacity for integration, and perceptions of their ability to influence and cause change, affected the extent to which they felt self-determined.

conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of supporting voice hearers in constructing meaningful, self-oriented narratives to strengthen their sense of autonomy. Future research should explore strategies that empower voice hearers to integrate their experiences constructively, thereby promoting resilience and autonomy.

Indexed as

HallucinationsPersonal AutonomyAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSelf ConceptSense of Agencyauditory verbal hallucinationsmental health recoverypersonal autonomypsychosisschizophreniaself‐determinationsense of agency

Identifiers

PMID41354941
PMCPMC13456353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.