ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Integrated ultrasound radiomics and clinical data to predict PD-1 blockade efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiparametric Abdominal Ultrasound as a Source of Imaging Biomarkers in Predictive and Personalized Medicine: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPD-1 blockade therapy has emerged as a valuable treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its therapeutic response and overall efficacy vary among patients. This study develops an automated framework for predicting response to PD-1 blockade with enhanced accuracy.
methodsA comprehensive two-phase investigation was conducted, comprising a retrospective multicenter cohort (n = 793) for model development and a prospective cohort (n = 60) for validation. We established an integrated predictive framework combining ultrasound radiomics with clinical indicators. Model performance was evaluated by ROC analyses, focusing on the area under the curve (AUC). Molecular analyses of liver tissues were performed to explore mechanisms underlying treatment response.
resultsThe ultrasound radiomics model achieved AUCs of 0.714 (training) and 0.617 (validation). The ensemble model, integrating both modalities, demonstrated superior predictive capability, with AUCs of 0.743 (training) and 0.641 (validation). The ensemble learning model, integrating both imaging and clinical modalities, exhibited superior predictive capability, attaining an AUC of 0.743 in the training cohort and 0.641 in the validation cohort. The ensemble model demonstrated exceptional clinical utility in predicting pathological necrosis following PD-1 blockade before hepatectomy, achieving an AUC of 0.692. Notably, it exhibited strong clinical utility in predicting pathological necrosis post-therapy, achieving an AUC of 0.692. Subsequent KEGG/GO analyses implicated key genes in necroptosis and programmed cell death pathways.
conclusionThe proposed ultrasound-based ensemble model offers a non-invasive, reproducible method to predict PD-1 blockade response in HCC, effectively integrating imaging and clinical data to enhance predictive accuracy and reveal potential molecular mediators of therapeutic efficacy. We developed an advanced automated predictive model that synergistically integrates ultrasound imaging with clinical indicators through ensemble learning methodology. This innovative model employs state-of-the-art deep learning architectures, specifically optimized convolutional neural networks, to accurately predict therapeutic response to PD-1 blockade in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.