ArticleScientific reports2025
Latent class patterns of work-life balance changes among Korean SME workers during COVID-19 based on organizational support and psychosocial health.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted work-life balance (WLB), particularly among workers in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study aimed to classify patterns of WLB changes and identify associated factors using the Job Demands-Resources model as a theoretical framework. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 503 SME employees in South Korea between July and September 2020. Latent class analysis identified WLB change patterns, and multinomial logistic regression compared factors across classes. Three latent classes were identified: stable (Class 1, 81.0%), worsened (Class 2, 11.4%), and improved (Class 3, 7.6%). Compared to Class 1, Class 2 was more likely to include individuals with higher economic status (OR = 2.163) and less likely to perceive strong organizational support (OR = 0.466). Compared to Class 1, Class 3 included more individuals with better psychosocial health and higher adherence to personal infection prevention (OR = 3.499). Compared to Class 3, individuals in Class 2 were more likely to have poorer psychosocial health (OR = 32.827), and less likely to report a supportive organizational environment (OR = 0.443). Workplace-level infection control scores were significantly higher in Class 3 than in other classes (p < .001). Distinct WLB patterns were observed among SME workers during COVID-19. Psychosocial health, economic status, infection prevention, and organizational support significantly influenced class membership. Identifying and supporting vulnerable groups during future public health crises is essential through targeted, workplace-level interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.