Observational studyRespiratory research2025
Comparative analysis of pulmonary function in diverse ethnic adults living at low and high altitudes.
Observational study in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh-altitude hypoxia poses substantial physiological challenges due to reduced atmospheric pressure and oxygen availability. While chronic exposure may induce compensatory adaptations in lung function, these responses likely vary by altitude and ethnicity. In China, both Han migrants and indigenous Tibetans reside at high elevations, offering a unique opportunity to explore ethnic-specific pulmonary adaptations.
methodsA retrospective, single-center observational study analyzed pulmonary function among adults residing at high (≥ 2,500 m) versus low (< 1,000 m) altitudes. Lung volumes, airflow, and diffusing capacity were compared between groups. Propensity score matching adjusted for baseline differences. Spearman correlation assessed associations between altitude and key parameters. Subgroup analyses were conducted by ethnicity and altitude strata. Multivariable linear regression was further applied for adjusting potential confounding.
resultsAmong 10,112 participants (495 high-altitude, 9,617 low-altitude), high-altitude residents exhibited significantly higher forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), inspiratory capacity (IC), total lung capacity (TLC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and DLCO corrected for alveolar volume (DLCO/VA) (all P < 0.05), which remained significant after matching. Ethnic subgroup analysis showed high-altitude Tibetans had significantly greater FVC, IC, TLC, DLCO, and DLCO/VA than both low- and high-altitude Han individuals. The increase in DLCO exceeded that of FVC, particularly in Tibetans. Within the Han group, residence ≥ 2,500 m was associated with improved pulmonary metrics. Within 2,500–4,500 m, FVC (r = 0.163, P = 0.003) and DLCO (r = 0.287, P < 0.001) positively correlated with altitude. Above 4,500 m, DLCO remained correlated (r = 0.242, P = 0.020), whereas FVC plateaued (P > 0.05).
conclusionsProlonged residence at high altitude is linked to increased lung volumes, airflow, and diffusing capacity. DLCO continued to rise beyond 4,500 m even as ventilatory adaptations plateaued, highlighting a sustained role of pulmonary diffusion in supporting oxygen uptake under chronic hypoxia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.