Observational studyBMC medical education2025
Enhancing medical students' self-efficacy toward national competency standards: a student-led training model in a lower-middle-income country.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing a national reform, Egyptian medical schools adopted the National Academic Reference Standards (NARS) in a transition toward competency-based education. However, preparing graduates to meet these standards remains challenging amid rapidly increasing student numbers and limited resources. This study evaluated the impact of the student-led Shouman Summer Training 2023/2024 (SST24) on trainees’ self-efficacy toward the NARS competencies.
methodsSST24 took place in August 2024 at Mansoura University Hospital’s departments across two 14-day waves. The program enrolled 652 trainees across 31 clinical departments, and combined hands-on bedside teaching, supervised procedures, and two supplementary workshops aligned with the NARS competencies. A pre–post observational design was used to assess changes in three outcomes: 1) self-efficacy toward NARS competencies measured with a 5-point self-report questionnaire; 2) clinical empathy, using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE-S); and 3) clinical knowledge, assessed with department-specific quizzes. Pre-post changes were analyzed using paired t-tests, mean differences (MD), and Cohen’s d.
resultsOf 652 trainees, 535 met inclusion criteria for the final analysis (82%). The program led to significant overall gains in self-efficacy toward NARS competencies (p < .001), but the outcomes varied depending on the training environment. Trainees in ‘People-Oriented’ departments, which emphasized patient interaction, reported higher gains in identifying health risks and adopting infection control measures compared to their peers in technical settings (MD = 0.85; d = 0.93 vs. MD = 0.49; d = 0.38). Conversely, trainees in ‘Technology- and Procedure-Oriented’ departments reported greater self-efficacy gains in adopting patient safety measures (MD = 1.64 vs. 1.31) and adhering to professional standards (MD = 0.72 vs. 0.58). However, the intensive focus on technical skills in these departments was associated with a modest but significant decline in empathy (mean JSE-S score change = -2.34). Clinical knowledge scores also improved significantly, with mean correct answers increasing by 15.8 and 14.1 percentage points in technology- and people-oriented departments, respectively (p < .001).
conclusionsSST24 enhanced trainees’ self-efficacy towards NARS competencies, as well as department-specific knowledge, demonstrating a scalable, student-led model for resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.