ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent retinal disease detection using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- RetinoMamba-AnatomyQuery: Anatomy-Guided Query Learning for Efficient Vision Impairment Screening from Retinal Fundus Images.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Lightweight Vision Transformer and Retinal Biomarker Fusion Framework for Early Glaucoma Detection: Toward Improved Clinical Screening.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- From intelligent models to clinical tools: the evolving landscape of AI in medical imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Agreement Between a General-Purpose AI Model and Retinal Specialists in Color Fundus Photography-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Factors associated with diabetic retinopathy: a cross-sectional study of 1477 patients across four cities in Anhui, China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising prevalence of retinal diseases is a significant concern, as certain untreated conditions can lead to severe vision impairment or even blindness. Deep learning algorithms have emerged as a powerful tool for the diagnosis and analysis of medical images. The automated detection of retinal diseases not only aids ophthalmologists in making accurate clinical decisions but also enhances efficiency by saving time. This study proposes a deep learning-based approach for the automated classification of multiple retinal diseases using fundus images. For this research, a balanced dataset was compiled by integrating data from various sources. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and transfer learning techniques were utilized to differentiate between healthy eyes and those affected by diabetic retinopathy, cataracts, or glaucoma. Multiple feature extraction methods were employed in conjunction with ANN for the multi-classification of retinal diseases. The results demonstrate that the model combining Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) with MobileNetV2 and DenseNet121 architectures, along with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature extraction and dimensionality reduction, as well as the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) algorithm, achieves highly satisfactory performance, attaining a peak accuracy of 98.2%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.